A Formal Proof Must Also Catch the Deliberately Broken Chip
A chip equivalence proof now has to fail on a planted bug before its passing result counts.
Hardware is catching up to software. hw.dev tracks where that is happening, where it is still broken, and what builders should do about it.
Hardware isn't slow because of physics. It's slow because of coordination, validation, and tooling.
Those constraints are starting to break.
The bottleneck is shifting to decision-making. The teams that win will be the ones that compress the loop:
Short posts on meaningful developments. What happened, why it matters, what it enables, operator read.
A chip equivalence proof now has to fail on a planted bug before its passing result counts.
A two-core board test exposed three failures that simulation and a clean boot would have hidden.
A KiCad rule now has to face the real board before an engineer trusts the prose that describes it.
A measured fallback router makes an old programmable chip faster, and the benchmark now guards that gain.
Long-form essays on the shifts reshaping hardware development. What is changing, why now, who benefits, what builders should do.
One test definition can now move from software model to prototype board, production line, and field.
Open tools are turning electrical, manufacturing, and mechanical review comments into checks that run on every board change.
Opinionated, living reference maps of the modern hardware development stack. Layers. Incumbents. Insurgents. Named gaps.
First cut at the layered map of modern hardware development (from design through manufacture) with named incumbents, insurgents, and gaps. Updated as the ground moves.
The end-to-end stack a modern hardware team actually runs on: design, simulation, test, CI, manufacturing. Layered, opinionated, with named gaps.
Where AI is actually compressing hardware cycle time today, layer by layer: RTL, place-and-route, DV, PCB, DFM, test authoring, supply.
The stack that lets every test run in CI, not a lab bench: unit, integration, HIL, on-target, and compliance. Where the gaps are.
What validation looks like when specs, tests, coverage, and sign-off artifacts all live in Git. The tools, the formats, the missing layer.
The workflow from idea to shipped unit (requirements, CAD, BOM, MFG, field) and which layers have been code-ified vs which are still PDFs in SharePoint.
hw.dev is operator-led. Software-first view of hardware. Everything-as-code. Shift-left testing. Product realization.
Not a news site. Not an aggregator. An intelligence layer: Signal to read the week, Analysis to read the shift, Stack Maps to read the space.
Future tools may include BOM Intelligence, Test Intelligence, Validation Intelligence, Supply Chain Intelligence, and Product Realization Intelligence. Intelligence is the identity; the tools are the follow-through.